A life has meaning to the extent that a person is actively engaged with projects of objective worth.

Wolf's fitting fulfillment view: meaning arises at the intersection of subjective attraction and objective attractiveness. Neither pure subjectivism (anything you care about counts) nor pure objectivism (the list exists whether you engage or not) captures the phenomenon. The compound view — active engagement with objective value — survives the standard counterexamples to both extremes. The Analyst decomposed this into two testable sub-claims. The Naturalist found partial replication support in well-being studies linking 'purposeful engagement' with self-reported meaningfulness. The Adversary tested it twice and could not break it, though flagged that 'objective worth' remains under-defined.